Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels' Dumb And Dumber sequel has been given a new lease of life after bosses at Universal Pictures snapped up the distribution rights days after the project was dropped by Warner Bros. executives. Both actors had signed up to reprise their roles as bumbling duo Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne in the follow-up and reteam with Bobby and Peter Farrelly, the writers and directors of the original 1994 cult comedy.
The film, which had been in the works for years at Warner Bros. subsidiary New Line Cinema, hit a stumbling block last week (ends14Jun13) when it was wiped from the studio's slate of planned projects amid reports of waning interest following the poor box office performance of Carrey's latest release, The Incredible Burt Wonderstone, in March (13).
However, the Farrelly brothers have bounced back with a new financier and distributor after Universal executives signed on to take charge of the film's release in North America, reports Deadline.com.
The upcoming comedy will be the third installment of the Dumb and Dumber franchise - prequel Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd hit cinemas in 2003.
Just when we thought they couldn't possibly be any dumber, Lloyd Christmas and Harry Dunne go and do something like this… and this time, they might not even get a chance to totally redeemed themselves.
Dumb and Dumber To, the long-awaited sequel to Bobby and Pete Farrelly's classic '90s comedy, Dumb and Dumber, was expected to begin shooting by New Line Cinema this spring. But to the dismay of fans hoping for a return trip to the Rockies, New Line's parent company, Warner Bros., replied, "See ya later!" (after a gleeful "Big Gulps, huh?"), dropping the project and shopping it to other studios.
Unlike New Line's disappointing 2003 prequel, Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd, the potential sequel secured the original blockheaded buddies, Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels, to hit the road in search of Harry's illegitimate daughter for a kidney transplant. Regardless of whether they'll be traveling in a doggy van or a moped, Warner Bros. sees limited promise in a follow-up. Despite the low $30 million budget range, the poor performance of the company's similar-costing Steve Carell-Steve Buscemi comedy, The Incredible Burt Wonderstone, recently grossed only $22 million domestically. By chance, the movie also featured Carrey.
As the Farrelly brothers seek a new financier and distributor for the project, our list of unanswered questions expands. Did Harry and Lloyd ever open their pet store, "I Got Worms"? Did Lloyd fall off the jet-way again? The original film cost $17 million to make but grossed more than $247 million at the time. If a new studio gets on board, New Line will still receive a licensing fee and a share of the backend. All that matters to us is that they're telling us there's a chance!
Follow Lauren On Twitter @Lopay92 | Follow Hollywood.Com On Twitter @Hollywood_com
More:'Dumb and Dumber 2' PlotJeff Daniels Sparks 'Dumb and Dumber 2' Rumors'Kick-Ass 2' Set Photos
From Our PartnersStars Pose Naked for 'Allure' (Celebuzz)Which Game of Thrones Actor Looks Least Like His Character? (Vulture)
The future of the long-rumored sequel to Dumb and Dumber is less clear than ever, after Jim Carrey bowed out of the project.
ETOnline reports that Carrey was rumored to have grown increasingly frustrated with studios New Line and Warner Bros.' lack of excitement about Dumb and Dumber To (yes, that was the actual working title) — and it ultimately led to Carrey exiting the project, telling ETOnline, "I would have thought Dumb and Dumber To was a no-brainer, after all it's implied in the title."
Carrey starred as Lloyd Christmas (alongside Jeff Daniels as Harry Dunne) in the hit 1994 Farrelly brothers comedy, which spawned a prequel, 2003's not-quite-as-beloved Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd. A proper sequel, in which both lead actors were reportedly reprising their roles, was said to be in the works, but Carrey's departure obviously renders that very much uncertain.
Carrey's next film is the 2013 comedy The Incredible Burt Wonderstone, alongside Olivia Wilde and Steve Carell.
Farrelly Brothers Finally Plotting 'Dumb and Dumber' Sequel?
Writers Chosen by Universal Gods for Jim Carrey-Led 'Bruce Almighty' Sequel
Jim Carrey, Steve Carell to Reunite in 'Burt Wonderstone'?
Much like its Greek mythological source material Wrath of the Titans is light on dramatic characterization sticking to blunt moral lessons and fantastical battles to tell its epic tale. That's perfectly acceptable for its 100 minute run time in which director Jonathan Liebesman (Battle: Los Angeles) unleashes an eclectic hoard of monsters upon his gruff demigod hero Perseus. The creature design is jagged gnarly and exaggerated not unlike a twelve-year-old's sugar high-induced crayon creations — which is perfect as Wrath is tailor made to entertain and enamor that slice of the population.
Clash of the Titans star Sam Worthington once again slips on the sandals to take on a not-quite-based-on-a-myth adventure a mission that pits Perseus against the greatest force in the universe: Kronos formally-incarcerated father of the Gods. A few years after his last adventure Perseus is grieving for his deceased wife and caring for their lone son but a visit from Zeus (Liam Neeson) alerts the warrior to a task even more urgent than his current seabass fishing gig. Irked that the whole Kraken thing didn't work out Hades (Ralph Fiennes) with the help of Zeus' disaffected son Ares (Edgar Ramirez) is preparing to unleash Kronos — and only Perseus has the required machismo to stop him. But Perseus enjoys the simple life and brushes off Zeus forcing the head deity to take matters into his own hands…just as Hades and Ares planned. The diabolical duo capture Zeus and having no one else to turn to Perseus proceeds into battle.
The actual reasoning for all the goings on in Wrath of the Titans tend to drift into the mystical realm of convolution but the ensemble and Liebesman's visual visceral directing techniques keep the messy script speeding along. As soon as one starts wondering why Perseus would ever need to hook up with battle-ready Andromeda (Rosamund Pike) or Poseiden's navigator son Agenor (Toby Kebbell) Liebesman and writers Dan Mazeu and David Johnson throw in another bombastic set piece another three-headed four-armed 10 000-fanged monstrosity on screen. Perseus' journey pits him against a fire-breathing Chimera a set of Cyclopses a shifting labyrinth (complete with Minotaur) and all the dangers that come with Hell itself. The sequences have all the suspense of an action figure sandbox brawl but on a towering IMAX screen they're geeky fun. If only the filler material was a bit more logical and interesting the final product would be the slightest bit memorable.
Liebesman reaps the best performances he possibly can from Wrath's silly formula Worthington again proves himself a charismatic underrated leading man. As the main trio of Gods Neeson Fiennes and Ramirez completely acknowledge how goofy shooting lightning bolts out of their hands must look on screen but they own it with campy fun tones. But the film's overwhelming CG spectacle suffocates the glimmer of great acting opting for slice-and-dice battle scenes over ridiculous (and fun) epic speak nonsense. If a movie has Liam Neeson as the top God it shouldn't chain him up in molten lava shackles for a majority of the time.
Wrath of the Titans is a non-offensive superhero movie treatment of classic heroes that feels more like an exercise in 3D monster modeling than filmmaking. Its 3D makeover never helps the creatures or Perseus pop turning Wrath into an even muddier affair than the single-planed alternative (although unlike Clash of the Titans you won't have 3D shaky-cam blur burned directly into your retinas). The movie reaches for that child sense of wonderment but instead cranks out a picture that may not even hold a child's attention.